
Entity head nicknamed "Igor" -
cropped and enlarged from frame #3 B&W --there
is an eyeball in left socket.
H-E-L-P
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-(
OUR WEB HOST IS HITTING US
WITH A $50 EXTRA CHARGE EACH MONTH
BECAUSE WE HAVE SO MANY PHOTOS TO SHOW YOU !!!!!!!!!! We
are getting
zapped because we want to show you the best photos of Bigfoot. Each time
you
visit, we get charged!
WE NOW HAVE A NON-PROFIT
SPONSOR, SO YOUR DONATIONS CAN BE PROCESSED BY
THEM SO YOU CAN GET A TAX DEDUCTION FOR YOUR DONATION. EMAIL
US FOR DETAILS
SCROLL
DOWN TO VIEW THE SITE v
"SEVENTEEN UNCLASSIFIED
CREATURES PHOTOGRAPHED
AT A HIGH SIERRAS CAMPSITE "
Introduction:
The Bigfoot Investigation Project was formerly Project Grendle and later
Project Bigfoot and
was HQ' ed Seattle,WA and Bellingham,WA. The mission was to get to
the bottom of the sasquatch stories.\
Notice:
Bigfoot or unclassified primates are not simple animals like the chimps
that Jane Goodall could
feed and hang out with. They do not pose for your camera. They hide, they
peek, and they are always
at least 90 feet from you, where you often do not see them, but your camera
does. As you read this site,
do not forget this caveat. It is not how well we could photograph
them, but rather it was amazing we could
get any photos at all. These are the best stills since the Patterson-Gimlin
58 sec movie of 1967. -- Why so many
creatures? One would expect just one... Well, they travel in family
or tribal groups, just as gorillas , chimps,
baboons, or humans do. So, you are seeing photos of an extended family,
or a clan. Why not?
In 1978, I was contacted by a disk jockey
in the SF Bay area, a "Dr. Don", who had a talk show, and he put me on
to a lady named
Judy Grant who told me that she had
a photo of a blond bigfoot. I was in Bellingham at the time, looking for
Bigfoot (which I found)
but I had no photos, so I arranged
to come down to meet this lady and go see the area with her, and to look
at her photos.
She had some 110 negs and prints, taken
with a plastic $40 camera of the 110 format. This is smaller than 35 mm,
and close to
a 16mm Minox type camera. It is rarely
used today, but was very popular back then. It fits in your back pocket.
The main photo showed a being that she
had not seen while camping, but which her friends noticed later when she
showed them
her camping photos. She had gone
there with her son and her boyfriend. She was recently divorced. The photo
in question showed
a tall being or entity, 125 feet away,
across a pond that was part of a creek. It was brown on the body, but had
a blond head of hair.
Particularly interesting was that it
was reflected in the water of the pond, in the early morning light. She
also had other photos that
showed various smaller Bigfoot creatures
at other spots around this pond, also not seen at the time. (These to be
mounted later.)
She had seen none of them.

Creatures
(2) TWO! - " Connie" and "Thom" (one editor, one
writer) WITH KIDS ON THEM.
(c) 1978 Jon-Erik Beckjord - NINE FEET TALL! Both standing
side-by-side,very close to each other.
ALSO KNOWN AS 'OLD YELLOW-TOP' from other states.
See http://www.gcbro.com/CAont0002.html
^ Note head reflected in water!
^Above- see kid's head on shoulder!
(Someone accused us of using Photoshop here. Well, in 1978, Photoshop did
not exist.)
WARNING:
PHOTO TAKEN AT 125 FEET DISTANCE. PLASTIC
110 CAMERA. WHAT YOU
SEE HERE IS ENLARGED AND CROPPED. UNDERSTAND?
THIS IS NOT A POSED CLOSE-UP LIKE YOUR GRANDMA, AS SHE
NIPS INTO THE OL' SHERRY BOTTLE. NO NASTY EMAILS, OK?
( VIRTUALLY ALL PHOTOS OF BIGFOOT ARE TAKEN UN-POSED,
WHERE YOU-DO-NOT-SEE-IT AT THE TIME. UNDERSTAND?)
We drove up to the El
Dorado National Forest, to the campsite in question, and we stayed camped
out in her pickup truck
bed, under a hard shell,
just 1/4 mile from the actual site, since it was late when we arrived.
In the morning, we hiked in and then
hiked back to get the
truck. Stangely, the lock on the back had been opened, and the back entry
door had been opened, but
nothing was taken.
We drove in and set up
camp. We found the site where the Bigfoot had stood, and made measurements.
Using a measuring
pole we had taken along,
and finding a tree branch where the Bigfoot had come up to 30 days
before, we found it had been
nine feet tall !
A picture was taken of Judy with the pole in place. Also--- a single
track was found at the spot, embedded in the
pine needles. It was
not castable.
Entity "Webmaster/photographer"
Jon-Erik Beckjord with tape recorder on a later trip to same site. (1981)
That night, we hear
howling-screeches from up the ridge, that were not coyote sounds. Also,
something seemed to be cautiously
creeping about near our
packs at night, be we never could see it.



^ Entity "Connie" enhanced. With baby "Autumn" ^
and teen child "Bobbie" ^
Strange beyond strange. JPL enhancement (B&W) shows multiple faces
on same head,
and baby's head in profile, in red, on shoulder. Even weirder in higher
res. Look at it
long enough and go insane....on rt, see teen creature hanging onto adult,
with back to us.
Has same dark ruff on back of neck and hair down spine as does Patterson
BF in film.
Head-shot shows in red two eyes and baby head .
The next day, on a hike up to the ridge,
we found another single track in the pine needles, similar to the one by
the pond.
We also found a flat area under some
pines, where there were 6-8 conical piles of pine-nut
debris, each 3-4 feet tall.
This was far too organized and large
for squirrels to do. Something taller than the piles was making them, as
it ate. Bears do not
eat pine cones or pine nuts. Neither
do humans.
As we left this zone, we found
something unseen was following us. We heard steps. Crackling of dead branches.
As we stopped to
look back, it would stop. When we walked,
it would walk. When we got close to camp, it went away.
While in camp, I took a number of photos
of the area, for the record. It seems Bigfoot was also in them, but I saw
nothing.
See cropped enlargements of these at<http://www.beckjord.com/bigfootphjotosbybeckjord>
We spent one more night, heard more screams, and more creeping sounds, then left the next day.
She explained that she had originally
taken her main photo, the Blond Bigfoot Photo, when she had woken early
at dawn and
had watched the sun come up, lighting
up the other side of the pond from the campsite, with fingers of light.
She took a photo of
that happening, and did not see the
Bigfoot then.
Subsequent computer enhancement by a supporter, Alan Gillespie, of our Sasquatch Research Project (formerly Project Grendel) at JPL in Pasadena showed that in B&W enhancements that the being as a very weird and distorted head/face that appears to have two overlapping faces, sharing one eye in common (so it has three). Large canine teeth can be seen, and there are at least three children on the creature, one approximately 12 yrs old in terms of humans, clutching the body,and two younger ones on the back and shoulders of the adult. (This is consistant with the Patterson-Gimlin Film and the Lori Pate Footage. Bigfoot carries kids.)
Note: what is "Bigfoot" ? It is
an emotionally laden term, and carries a lot of baggage with it.
Too many people have decided
what it is, or is not, or has to be,
without having ever spent one day in the woods. So far, it is an un-catchable
entity that the Indians
tell us was here long before they got
here. Perhaps "tall, non-human primatoid entity" is better.
MORE
1978 --- HEAD AND TORSO OF CREATURE, PRIMATE/HOMINOID WITH HEADS
OF TWO YOUNGER ONES ON CHEST, bodies hidden by brush. Same
area at end of pond.
Codename "Peter-g"
this is a head and a torso and it has one or maybe two heads on its chest,
possibly children, or siblings. Their bodies are hiden by brush. Ignore
the circular line at bottom.
This photo is a B&W cropped image from a 110 color master print. Peter-g
and co are to right of
the tree where Igor and his friend are in the 1979 photos.
WARNING: THIS PHOTO TAKEN AT ABOUT 175 FEET WITH
A CHEAP
PLASTIC CAMERA. 110 FILM. IT IS CROPPED AND ENLARGED HERE.
DO NOT EXPECT THE SAME SHARPNESS AS A CLOSE UP OF YOUR
WIFE AS SHE RUNS OFF WITH THE POOL MAN, TAKING YOUR WALLET
AND CREDIT CARDS. NO NASTY EMAILS, OK?
The following
year, since I knew Bigfoot was showing up in photos where we did not see
them directly, due to distance, I returned with a camping
partner, Susy
Adams, of Seattle. I had a hunch that Bigfoot was attracted to women and
children. Susy was also a girlfriend and
good company.
On this trip,
I took everything but the kitchen sink.Three big footlockers of camera
gear and camping gear. We flew to SF,
took a bus to
Stockton, and hired a man with a pick up to get us into the site in the
mountains on the way to Tahoe. About 6000
feet. I had 16mm
motion picture equipment, 35mm still cameras, a 35mm Hollywood movie camera,
tripods, Polaroids, a 120
medium format
still camera, and lots of audio gear. (I still had not learned.) I felt
that it was merely lack of equipment that had prevented a major Bigfoot
discovery to that date. (ho ho ho ). I also took enlargements of the various
BF photos I and Judy had taken, so that these might entice the creatures
to return.
The 1979 Sierra Ponds Expedition, by Project Bigfoot, (Later
changed to the Sasquatch Research Project),
with your webmaster
and Susy Adams here in a newspaper photo. With 16mm, 35mm,
120 camera, binoculars, bait,
photos from the
last year, recorders, and more. What would we get?
These
below are cropped and enlarged sections from the master full frame
photos. Range - 235 ft. Full frame:see link
at
bottom. If I did not see them with my bare eyes, it is due to the long
distance involved, over water. (Gave security to the beings...)

Entity
" Carl " - in each frame. It moves!
Cropped images, enlarged - #27 and #28 frames full profile and 1/4
profile
Head shots. Note large eye, flat-top head, faint smile in 281, long muzzle,
nose-bridge.
Appears to be same being, only it has moved its head, towards the kids
fishing. In 281, there is
a trace of the bulge of the other eye (over past the nose-bridge).Also
has fringe of falling-over hair
that is also seen in no. 3, below.

"Carl"
drawn note low ear as in
"Carl" with head turned 45 deg.
Patterson film
note teeth.
WARNING:
BIGFOOT DOES NOT POSE FOR YOU OR FOR US, AND THIS
35MM
PHOTO WAS TAKEN AT 235 FEET DISTANCE AND IS CROPPED AND ENLARGED
HERE. DO NOT EXPECT THE SAME SHARPNESS AS A CLOSE UP
OF
YOUR MOM OR YOUR CHILD dribbling ICE CREAM ON YOUR NEW SUIT. DO-YOU-UNDERSTAND?
No nasty emails, OK?
"Dog-faced Bigfoot" reported : "I received a second-hand report that an elderly lady has witnessed a "tall, lanky, kinda skinny, gorilla shaped creature, with long arms, covered with red/brown fur head to toe" cross a dirt road on two legs in front of her car one night 2 years ago. This was in the Erving State Forrest (MA). She saw the same creature again last year crossing the same road early one morning. She said it looked right at her. The weird thing about her report is that she insists that it had a "Collie" like face. Has anyone heard of such a thing? Maybe she grew up watching too many episodes of "Lassie" or something....either that or we have some kind of skinny, bipedal "Dogfoot" walking around in the Erving State Forest. "
There is also a book called "The Beast of Bray Road" that discusses the same thing.
So perhaps here,
on this page, we have photos of this creature.
Beckjord standing at the spot where most
of the photos below were taken in 1979, and some of those
in 1978. The view from this spot on a small
rise is towards the pond and its end, some 235 ft away.
Perhaps the beings felt safer with water separating us. Some cameras do
look like guns.
We started by
finding a line 13 Bigfoot tracks doing up the rise from the
pond at the far end, on a diagonal. All deep in the
sand and debris.
Then some single tracks in the mud by the water. Three at widely separated
spots. Large and skinny feet.
14 inches.
During the week, I took color and B&W photos of all the spots where BFs had appeared before, and I was hoping for similar or better results than 1978.
During the camp
out, we had some kids appear from a neighboring campsite, and they made
alot of noise and and proceeded to fish, throwing out fish lines and bait.
For the record, a took some B&W 35mm shots of them. I also took B&W
Infrared shots
when Susy and
I were alone. More about these later.
To cut to the
chase, we had a relaxing week there, doing nude swimming and sunning, since
no other campers came
up during the
weekdays. The 16 mm camera had a malfunction and jammed often. We never
had a reason to use the
35mm movie camera
with its very very expensive film. I took lots of stills in all formats
and colors. Polaroid photos showed on the spot that some strange images
were in the close by rocks that we could not see by eyes alone.
Then we went home.
From the lab,
I found that the B&W fine-grain film had recorded the kids fishing.
It also caught something else.
To the left of
the kids, were I had taken a color photo then year before that had a cluster
of BF creatures in it, were more
creatures, but
strange ones (stranger than Bigfoot?).
There are four
frames in B&W, all taken at asa 125 using a 35mm Minolta camera,
with a 50 mm lens. The images here are cropped and enlarged to show the
creatures. These are basically three beings, with heads showing, that have
broad faces, no forehead, a flat-top type head, a long muzzle, large oval
or round black eyes and mouths that are shut. Two photos show the same
being that has moved its head from full profile to quarter profile, showing
it was alive and not a model, while the other photo shows
two beings full
front on. (It is also to be seen in subsequent years , in different positions
around one main tree, as if it were a
"resident alien"....).
We also have another head image, from the same set of bushes, and will
add this later. It looks more like a primate. That will make four creatures.
(Note on the photo below on left - there is some sort of spiraling vapour
coming out of the
left nostril.
See it? ) Film - Panatomic X. Asa 125.B&W. Frames 27,28 and then
3,4,& 5.



Photo fr. 3 -Ponds Alien 1979 - one of three shots.
Note there are actually two of them. One behind the other.Dark area is
a sequoia tree.25 in wide.
Entity
" Igor"
Entity "Igor " & Entity "Linda" Susy
Adams,posing close to spot. 1980
Same tree. She has other entities,imho,
all around her, but does not see them.
They seem as if posing. Some viewers
will see one by her rt arm, and above
her head on her left side. Others will
will see many more, and most will
just see a mess of branches.
WARNING:
35MM PHOTO TAKEN AT 235 FEET WHEN WE DID NOT SEE THE ENTITIES.
CROPPED
AND ENLARGED HERE. DO NOT EXPECT SAME CLARITY AS A SNAPSHOT OF
YOUR
EX-WIFE STANDING AT THE DOOR DEMANDING HER LATE ALIMONY. DO-YOU-UNDER-
STAND?
:-) No nasty emails, OK?
Note: Left photo, enlarged, is
from frame #3, and middle one is from frame #5. In the left frame, some
viewers may see
a small monkey head and and hands on
top of the creature's head on its left, by the dark treetrunk. Nickname
"Jane".
Note: critics have said "there
are no eyes" -- well, we cannot see any primate eyes, but then, abductees
have reported over and
over that aliens who examine them on
tables in ships have large total-surface type eyes, like insects. No pupils,
no iris. So look again at these photos. Others complain these are "rocks"
-- well these beings move into other positions in other frames, and
there are no such rocks at that spot..
just large half-buried boulders, and tree branches. We'll post some
close ups of that zone
shortly. Otghers say (Like NASA) "
A trick of light and shadow"... well, we checked this out at same time
of day, and all shadows are very diffuse and greyish, nothing solid and
black or white. You have to hold a piece of cardboard 6 inches from
a surface for a dark shadow to appear. Tree branch shadows are all
diffused. Tree trunk shadows are long retangles, as a tube would make.
Our enemies in the Bigfoot field, which
are legion, are VERY UPSET that these images got on George Noory's
site. Suffer!.



"Roderick" with eyeball and eyelid - By
Thomas E. Smith, 6/72 -Cascades. - SRP logo - best composite
Unknown primate "Roderick" with eyeball pointed out in deep socket.
Note long nose, with nostils as slits, long muzzle, teeth, no chin,flat
head,
no forehead, supra-orbital ridges, fringe of hair flopping over from flat
head.
There is a very dark eyeball in the other eye socket. This a head, much
enlarged. Body is hidden by brush. 1979. Compare with Smith drawing -
has same large nasal passage, large nostrils, flat head, no forehead,
deep eyesockets, heavy browridges, extended muzzle.
WARNING:
ORIGINAL 35MM PHOTO TAKEN AT 235 FEET WITH REGULAR LENS
AND
IS CROPPED AND ENLARGED HERE. PHOTO OF GIRL (above) WAS TAKEN WITH
TELEPHOTO
LENS. DO NOT EXPECT SAME CLARITY AS A PHOTO OF YOUR KID
SITTING
ON SANTA'S LAP AND STEALING HIS WALLET. :-) Got it?
NO
nasty emails, OK?



Patterson-Gimlin BF 1967 -^ close-up of
mouth. - ^ Background erased
- ^ P/G BF head with baboon
of Roderick
type creature on shoulder
Tom Mason, Jon-Erik Beckjord, Gary
Galligan, Jaime Smith - setting off from Stockton.
We
returned in 1981, with myself and three recently divorced men who wanted
a change. One was a professional moutain lion tracker
who said his
dogs refused to follow Bigfoot tracks. We stayed a week, took CBS news
at first, and as soon as the crew left, we began to
find tracks and
hear screams -- very,very close. These below were some of our results.


Code
name "Peter-b" in negative image.
"Peter-b" in positive image.
Drawing of "Peter-b"
FLASH!
We found one more image similar to Roderick -- taken 1981. Same general
area (it moved) It has a CHIN....something apes do not have.
Also, in Kodak print, it has a eyeball.
Note the same
long nosebridge, deep eyes, flat top, no forehead. Floppy hair on one side.
Entity "Dmitri" -(after a Russky researcher) -1978
This guy
was peeking around a dead tree at the exit area of the pond water, and
about 150 ft to left of where
entities 1-4
had been the next year (1979). FYI, there was ten feet of empty space
behind this dead tree, down.
This head of
this entity has the flat top, two eyes with binocular vision, a long prominent
nose-bridge/air passage,
an extended (prognathous)
muzzle, and perhaps a slightly open mouth. No real forehead. Something
like a cross
between a baboon
and a wolf. Has some of the traits of entities 1-4. Is "Bigfoot" a mixture
of baboon, wolf, human and
ape?
WARNING:
35MM PHOTO TAKEN AT 235 FEET, AND CROPPED AND ENLARGED HERE.
BIGFOOT
DOES NOT POSE 4 U, OR ANYONE. DO NOT EXPECT SAME CLARITY AS YOUR
CLOSE
UP OF YOUR BOSS COMING TO FIRE YOU AFTER YOU PUT A "WHOOPEE" CUSHION
ON
HIS OFFICE CHAIR. NO NASTY EMAILS, OK?? "WHAT WE DIDN'T SEE, IS WHAT YOU
DO
GET."
"Saint Sasquatch" -- is
a gorilla style head in a tre 40 ft up from the master
photo from the 1978 exped. 235 ft from camera. Has ring of lights
over head.
Also, an eye in center of those lights. Note split muzzle below nose, and
eyes
(normal ones) just below halo. Are supernatrural sasquatch beings sent
to
warn us to stop polluting the environment? (Color copy being mounted
soon)
NOTE: HELP ! GIVE US A LINK!!!!!!!!!!!
Google
rates sites on how many links to it there are. You link us; we'll link
to you. Deal? Tell us.
He does not say what they are, he says what they are not. Note carefully. He has to be very conservative. READ LETTER
We have here an embarassing abundance of images of non-human life
forms. Forgive us -
but there seems to have been a congregation of entities or
unknown animals at this one camp spot. If we hid
away some the images of the entities, this would be dishonest. There
is no rule that says
entities only come in ones or twos... humans come in all sizes
of groups. Entities can also. Why not?
Note: These
are
the real deal. No models, no artwork. Not photos of models, not photos
of drawings. Actual "EBE"s (visiting) or maybe unknown animals.
Note: Best
viewed on Netscape, if you use Explorer, go to "full screen" under view,
in AOL browser, if colors are bad, minimize
AOL, and click
into Explorer if you have it separately, and then enter our URL. We want
you to see the best.
(Entities are nicknamed
after famous or near famous people in the Bigfoot/UFO/Alien fields.)
All these images
were on display in the San Francisco UFO,Bigfoot,Loch Ness Monster and
Crop Circles Museum
1997-98 and were
enjoyed by thousands of people. Now it is time to reach a larger public
to educate them that
alien entities
do exist, and are around us, watching our cooking, fishing,mating,and other
human activities. They are
watching us, and
probably taking mental notes, just as our astronauts would if they found
entities on Mars, if NASA
would allow
them to tell us (who pay NASA's bills....). We study them, and
we are in turn, also studied. Two way.
Carla Randle (To the Fortean Times)
In the late 60s we lived in Station Street, Crewe, which we left when the whole area was to be slum-cleared. The houses were old fashioned, very basic terraced ones opening directly onto the street, and as everyone knew everyone else it was safe to 'play out' quite late at night. One evening, Mark (aged about 9) was walking along the wide pavement when he saw some characters coming toward him. There were 3 I think, and they were somewhat taller than people.
They were dressed as men in suits, but
had very large DOGS' HEADS!! These heads swayed widely from side to side
as the creatures walked. Mark was absolutely terrified as they approached,
but they seemed not to notice him and he passed them safely. He ran all
the way home and only told me about the 'Big Dogs' as he called them some
time later. I laughed my head off, thinking he was trying to scare me.
When it became obvious that he was really scared, I tried to figure out
what he'd seen. My 10-year old brain could only come up with ghosts or
aliens, neither of which seemed to fit the bill.
NEW PHOTOS 2004. More aliens, and close to a traditional Bigfoot. CLICK HERE.
LAST UPDATE - 12/25/05
Phone - 415-289-2277.Serious calls will be returned. Mature calls only.