For years we have wanted to do this, to share our work with the Bigfoot public, and now we are, starting with frame 61 and adding
more and more in series until we get to frame 377, where the creature heads off away from Patterson. Then we will add frames down from
301, heading for  frame number 1.  These will be jpgs, scanned from prints, made off 35mm negs, taken from 16mm first copy,taken from the
original. If you note some unusual features, be sure to send us  email. Note - read this -- in some cases we will show two versions of a frame.
Or more -- such as B&W vs color, and enhanced vs normal. Enlarged by macrophotography vs the 16-to 16-to-35-to print system. Do not forget these images are  ENLARGED AND CROPPED. Just the creature is in the cropped frame. Send us $25,000 and we will show the entire frame also, in each case.
One thing to watch for - in frame 351 there is a daytime bol (ball of light) and in another, maybe 364, there is another one, and that one has an ape face in it. There are weird strings that are not scratches, and in 352, if I recall, they go thru the nipples. There are imho, kids in the bushes, and on the momma.
Two large green entities  appear in the last 5 sec of the film. Off in the distance, of course. In frame 270, to come, there is a tube on one leg, in frame 290, there is a cannister on the rt leg,  and in 350, there
is a cylinder on one arm, and some salvaged glass coke bottles on the body, perhaps held in with string, as a"canteen". This is a very weird film.
For more details on weird things, see our main site, http://www.bigfoot.org

FILM STUDY DETAILS: we use a "first copy" (second gen) 16mm film for our work. There are 951 frames, not 952.
The speed is 16 fps. It never was 24 fps. We have digitized all frames onto a master tape @ 65 mb per frame, with many
transferred to CD ROM. (This has nothing to do with Jeff Glickman, and those old cd roms are small in mb size and are lost or
hidden away and are not usable nor available.Glickman does not have them. - Don't even try.) We find photographic copies are
superior to digital copies, by a factor of 5x, fwiw.

We have catalogued all 951 frames for marks on the edges, for I.D., and we have made notes of all usual items in each of the frames, plus normal items. There are children on the creature. There are other BFs in the film background, and many,many
strange entities as well. The background is a sort of Alice in Wonderland "Tulgey Woods". Full off odd stuff. (P&G had no idea what they were riding into.) The other bfs and entities move only slightly and thus are not noticed in the moving film, whereas the
walking momma BF "Patty", is noticed. At the very end, in the last 4 sec of the film, two strange entities appear, on a rise, and we are working to enlarge these. "The hills are alive".

When did P&G develop the film? IMHO, it really does not matter. If it was shot a few days prior to Oct 20,1967, well, so what?
It would have to have been, since processing of Kodachrome movie film was done in special labs, probably in Palto Alto,CA
and then mailed back to Roger's brother in law for screening on Sunday, Oct. 22. The days discrepancies does not negate
the content of the film. The film is just too weird to have been faked, and the butt crack and large butt visible negates any
use of any gorilla suit sold in 1967. And no 6 ft tall man could make a stride of 41 inches. 6'5" seems about right.

For our use, we have a roll of 35mm full frame negs and another roll of 80 or so enlargement negs in 35mm color.

FYI,  the original film seems to be held up still in litigation and is  allegedly in the hands of a law firm. Copies of frames
by Bruce Bonney were made off the original. The TV Doc, "Sasquatch-legend meets science" was made using a first-copy
of the film. (Second Gen.) Work done by Miles K. Davis is done off a 6th gen copy, or the DVD. Davis will not talk to me,
so as to preserve his "politically-Bigfoot-correct " status with the F&B people.

       Can we afford to do this? NO! --- We need your help. As word gets around our bandwidth fees will get bigger and bigger and bigger.
Donations will enable us to not make this a pay-per-vue site.
Send cash,check,money order,
or donate via paypal.
The MORE HELP we GET, the FASTER THE FRAMES WILL GO UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pay by credit card? We can arrange. email us for details.
Checks, cash, money orders - send via
Snail mail---  E.Beckjord, Box 9502,Berkeley,CA 94709  (Training? USAF Academy high altitude photo reconnaissance classes.)

61-       Rt ft is raised with toes showing. Rt hand with long fingers is also see in fr 72,307, 336, and 339. Important to note that the
black triangle seen in most frames, here is NOT high on the shoulders as it is in most frames, and there is a short-haired zone between it's apex and the rear of the mother's head. This leads us to speculate that the black triangle is a head of a child, the same one that is riding piggyback and is not part of the mother's hair. Important item- anus is visile and the hint of female genitalia.
72     -  Left foot here is raised and has same extended heel as 300 below on rt  foot. Some people and we also  see a child riding piggy back. SEE CROOKED UP BENT LEFT LEG AND FOOT OF CHILD OVER MOTHER'S BUTTOCK. Note hair line of backbone on child does NOT match up, with butt-crack of mama. In enlargements of this image, a swastika (Indian symbol) is seen on rt shoulder blade area. (Indians used this symbol  long before Hitler stole it. Do not ignore this caveat.)
300*  -  Bizarre overall and overlapping very large head image  of something like a forest spirit using BF and the background to form it.. - mouth is at waist, one eye is a baby's head, other is a green bush, few will
see it.. but back away from screen. On the actual  BF image, rt leg has extended heel. Is this a shoe sole?  Note baby on shoulder.
301 -  tba...  but has extended heel.

;

364- devil head on diagonal on midriff area, 2ft x 3 ft, declining ape/baboon head on left of main head, (see 350 for full baboon head), odd details on upper thigh. Eye visible.
366-eye visible
367*- nostrils open.
368-demon type head by corner of hump. Nostrils closed again. Eye very open. See whites of eye. Picasso art head over arm on
chest.
 

  369*  --baby on chest. -Looks at Roger-see whites of eyes.
  370**  --  baby on chest.   Has open mouth with teeth, too thin to be Gigantopithecus, Matt Moneymaker take note.
  371*  -- Also has baby on chest. Open mouth, like a pie-serving shape, or pizza serving. Note ear. Rounded chimp muzzle.
Note large anomalous humanoid head on side, 3 ft high, rt side in darkness, whole head is facing us, as in 337. The creature
may be a conglomerate of many entities, clinging together, with various ones being dominant in different frames, as in
claymation commericals, and art-films. A whirling mass that forms and reforms and reforms, as it goes. Constant flux.
Head similar to 339.

                    open mouth         Jaw thin -not Gigantopithecus which is massive. Doug Hajicek agrees.

Notice carefully:  The head on the creature changes its shape throughout the film. This is abnormal, and is special.
See for yourself.

Also, periodically, we get junk mail telling us that we are "seeing" things in a grainy film. The film was made on asa 25 Kodachrome II, the finest color film stock there is. It is ultra fine grain. I am checking to see if the asa was 64 or 25.
I do recall using Kodachrome  16mm film for a an underground movie, and that was asa 25.

FYI, our film copy shows a print-thru from the original that shows KODAK SAFETY FILM -- KODACHROME II  on it,
plus the number 8, plus L-1  plus a bar, a square block, and an inverted triangle. I lost the leader, it was old,
so do not know about any dates of processing.

Tracks -- foot vs stills and one short snippet of extra 16mm ---  IMHO, and many will not like this, the feet morph, and
the tracks fit some of the feet seen in the film, and other tracks do not. But morphing feet can make for morphing tracks.
This is a morphing monster. Heck -- look at 371 above... has a giant head on mid section, with 1/2 the face in
shadow. 5% of you will see it. The rest will call us crazy.

More on tracks:
In the film, the heel is first long then short,
the toes have big toe outside, then inside,
the hair on ankle is fist high up , then lower down.

The heel is wide, then narrow, then wide.

The center area varies.

This is shown in the actual tracks as photographed

by Lyle Laverty, then cast by Timus, and as filmed by

Patterson.

They vary drastically. This is NOT due to normal

flexibility,etc.

The length of the feet vary also, from toe to heel.

So, 1) the actual feet in the film morph and change.

2) so do the actual track impressions.
 

Now let the weak excuses begin.

Re Greg Long, ( The Making of Bigfoot -a debunking book) "Mr. Sensitive"...Patterson may have been a hustler, and con man. But so what? Even Saddam could
film a bigfoot - or a UFO in Iraq. Basically, Long cannot prove Bob Hieronimus was in the film as a hoaxer. Has no proof.
Just stories.  "The film talks, bullsh*t walks. "  We'll debate Long any time, anywhere. Or Hieronimus. (Hieronimus- Bosch!)

Points  by ROGER KNIGHTS  as to why a human being, (Bob Hieronimus) could not be in a gorilla suit in this film:
A Patty-Walk Scorecard:
Features to be Matched in a Patty-Walk Re-Creation (Version 1.0)

Roger Knights

NECESSARY:

1. Head: 30% (?) wider and deeper than an scaled-to-height man’s,
2. Shoulder breadth (from latter frames of the film): 30% wider than a scaled-to-height man’s.
3. Chest and waist: 30% (?) wider and deeper than a scaled-to-height man’s.
4. Arm length: 85% of leg length, in conjunction with an elbow that bends at the arm’s mid-point.
5. Torso: 20% longer than a scaled-to-height man’s.
6. Arm breadth: at least xx% thicker than a scaled-to-height man’s.
7. Thigh breadth: at least yy% thicker than a scaled-to-height man’s.
8. Foot: 14.5 inches long. (Or use a percentage derived from a proportion-of-height.)
9. Height: at least 6 feet; 6 1/2 feet would be “nicer,” and 7 feet nicer still.
*******
10. A “compliant gait”—i.e., one with the knees bent and no head-bobbing.
(See the Glickman report, p. 21, for details on the knee motion to be matched.)
11. Patty-like arm motion (extreme swinging), with the pivot point at the natural shoulder joint.
12. A backward look without wrinkling the suit or dislodging the head.
13. A slight forward bend from the upper back.
14. Toe-elevation about 14 inches (?) above the ground on each step.
15. Traversal of xx feet in yy seconds.
16. Traversal over sand or gravel, not pavement.

NICE (50% should be matched):

A. Breasts.
B. Face and skull-shape: Patty-like (e.g., peaked skull).
C. Eyes: spaced apart in the same proportion to the head that a man’s are.
(I.e., not like the closely spaced eyes of “Harry” in the film “Harry and the Hendersons.”)
D. Jaw-line below the shoulder-line.
E. Hair color and hair length: Non-uniform (Glickman, p. 22).
F. Hair texture and density: Patty-like.
G. Body shape: “well-defined” (Glickman, p. 22).
H. A butt crack.  (As I have noted many times-- EB)
*******
I. Knee cap: realistic-in-motion (Glickman, p. 22, said this would be difficult to fake).
J. Some hand and foot flexion (Glickman p. 17).
K. Some “muscle movement” or “surface plasticity” (Glickman, p. 22).
L. Half-stride length: about 46.7 inches (Glickman’s computation).

Note: a half-stride length is basically from heel of one foot to heel of the other foot. I'd call it a stride in common parlance. (EB)

Roger Knights is at   [email]rogerknights@comcast.net[/email]

       MORE TO BE ADDED !!!!!!!!!!   DONATE TO HELP.

Updated 1/5/05